Auditor, Education Commissioner call for school superintendent data to be more transparent to taxpayers

 


The Bluegrass Institute has pointed to serious problems with the transparency of information about public school superintendents for several years now with our Rewarding Failure expose.

Our efforts are now being vindicated.

In a press conference today, Kentucky Auditor of Public Accounts Adam Edelen and Kentucky Commissioner of Education Terry Holliday called for greatly increased public access to information about local school superintendents. The auditor and commissioner want every superintendent’s employment contract, total benefits package and annual evaluations to be readily available in a one-stop source at the Kentucky Department of Education’s web site.

Holliday and Edelen also called for better training of local school board members regarding their duties to effectively oversee operations of their superintendent and schools. In the news release for the press conference, Holliday said:

“We’re seeing far too many cases where adults are making choices that are right for them rather than what’s really right for students and their future.”

The immediate impetus for these new public transparency improvements is a recent series of what the auditor has sometimes called “scandalous” audits. These audits found superintendents in several school districts were taking the taxpayer for a ride.

In the worst case uncovered so far, which involves the Dayton Independent School District’s former superintendent, Edelen’s findings are so bad that the case has been referred to the FBI. Edelen actually used the term “fraud” during his absolutely shocking Dayton Schools audit press conference.

As veterans of many open records requests for superintendent evaluations, the Bluegrass Institute is only too familiar with the difficulty the public has encountered in trying to obtain this critical information. We are also well aware of the vacuous and unrevealing reporting that has far too often been the hallmark of those annual superintendent evaluations.

Holliday also said:

“I have always been an advocate for openness and transparency. I welcome the auditor’s recommendations and hope this will result in a greater level of fiscal oversight and responsibility in our school districts. It is the duty of us all to be accountable and good stewards of the taxpayer’s money.”

As Edelen said at the Dayton audit press conference:

“The kids don’t exist to support the bureaucracy. The bureaucracy exists to support them.”

To all of this, we can only say, “Amen!”

Reason to give #27: Keeping bureaucrats accountable

We are counting down the top 30 reasons to donate $17.92 each month to the Bluegrass Institute as part of our 1792: Never Out of Date campaign.

Reason #27 to donate: You want to see Kentucky’s government bureaucrats held accountable. The Bluegrass Institute has worked to help make this happen.

Our report Rewarding Failure shed light on the rubber-stamping of Kentucky school district superintendent evaluations. One of the districts that was profiled in the report was Newport Independent schools. Just a few months later after an internal leadership assessment report, the superintendent stepped down.

The Bluegrass Institute fights to keep government bureaucrats accountable. Learn more here.

Rewarding Failure: The rubber-stamping of Kentucky superintendent evaluations

 


Rewarding Failure is a commentary released by the Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions discussing the broken process of evaluating school district superintendents in Kentucky.

Four districts - JeffersonKnoxCarter and Newport Independent - are profiled with copies of their actual performance evaluations.

Full commentary in PDF

Summary

rub-ber-stamp [ruhb-er-stamp] -verb (used with object) 1. To imprint with a rubber stamp. 2. To give approval automatically without consideration: to rubber- stamp the president’s proposals.

Nothing more accurately portrays the concept of rubber-stamping than the performance evaluations of Kentucky’s school district superintendents. Kentucky’s recent National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) proficiency rates in math, reading and writing were abysmal. According to the NAEP, little more than one out of three fourth-grade students are proficient in math and reading, while in eighth grade, the most recent data show scarcely more than one in four students are proficient in math and writing.

Furthermore, a 2010 news release from the Kentucky Department of Education identified 13 school districts that failed to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under No Child Left Behind for an astonishing eight years or more. Eight years! Think about how many students graduated in that time and suffered through their school district’s underperformance.

Still, regardless of performance, Kentucky superintendents generally receive rave reviews that are not based on the achievement of goals and school performance. For example, Jefferson County Public Schools Superintendent Sheldon Berman, whose salary is $260,000 a year plus benefits, was praised by his board in May 2010 for his talent as an “engaging public speaker” and in the area of labor relations. Meanwhile, thousands of children are getting left behind in their educational opportunities in the 41 schools in Berman’s district that failed to make AYP in 2009. The JCPS school board’s evaluation of Berman is long on flowery language about Berman’s speaking qualities but short on measurable results. Yet somehow – despite the results – these evaluations almost always are accompanied by a salary increase.

Full commentary in PDF

McCreary Superintendent evaluation includes student achievement

The most recent performance evaluation of the McCreary County Public Schools superintendent includes a section devoted to “student achievement”. This is huge step forward with regards to holding district leadership accountable for poor performance.

In the 2010 evaluation, there is no such mention. You can view the 2011 evaluation here. Both of these evaluations were obtained via the Kentucky Open Records Act. If you look closely on the “Student Achievement & Learning” page, you will notice there is an asterisk with the title. At the bottom of the page you will see that this section of the evaluation was recommended by “education support groups”. Yes! yes it was!

Rewarding superintendents while the students in their district suffer through underperformance is an issue that has been plaguing Kentucky for quite sometime. For full analysis of this issue, be sure to checkout Rewarding Failure: The rubber-stamping of Kentucky superintendent evaluations.

‘Rewarding Failure’ on #FOIAchat

I will be discussing education open records requests and “Rewarding Failure” on FOIAchat this afternoon. FOIAchat takes place each Friday, 2pm EST on Twitter as a way for transparency advocates across the nation to share stories and best practices for open records.

You can follow me on twitter @LoganBIPPS and the hashtag for the conversation is #FOIAchat.

Open Records: Jefferson County Schools, Berman performance evaluation

An open records request was sent today to obtain the most recent performance evaluation for outgoing Jefferson County Public Schools (JCPS) superintendent Sheldon Berman.

JCPS and Berman were part of the investigative report “Rewarding Failure” which shed light on the broken process of evaluating the performance of school district leaders. With this records request, the Bluegrass Institute is following up to see if there has been any progress!

You can track the request progress here!

Cheating our kids: poor performance = pay increase?

If your child’s school district had only 11.6% of 11th grade students meeting the benchmark ACT score for math in 2008 and an embarrassing 9.2% in 2009, would say say there is work to do? With scores not much more impressive in other subjects would you say the superintendent deserved a perfect score on their performance evaluation?

Well, this is the case in Carter County Public Schools. Below are graphs indicating the percentage of 11th grade students meeting the ACT benchmark score in various subjects. The numbers are not flattering.

Despite these numbers, superintendent Darlene Gee was given rave reviews on her evaluations with ZERO mention of student performance. These evaluations were accompanied by salary increases. Significant increases…

Take a look at the evaluation for yourself…
This amounts to rewarding failure. Student performance is poor while the leader of the district continues to receive significant pay increases? How does that work?