“In 2002, Kentucky was given $6,316 per student; the U.S. average per-pupil spending was $8,206, and at that time, Kentucky ranked 42nd among the other states. Compare that to the 2013 spending, which says that $9,266 was spent per student in Kentucky. The U.S. average was $11,254 spent per student, and Kentucky ranked 37th out of 50 states, the report indicates.”
So, according to Prichard’s numbers, in 2013 Kentucky would have spent $1,988 less per pupil than the national average.
Going to page 5 in the Citizen’s Guide, I learned the ultimate source for these financial figures is supposed to be the annual Public Education Finances documents from the US Census Bureau.
OK, we use those Census documents, too.
But, Prichard’s 2013 numbers didn’t look right. So, I went to Table 11 in Public Education Finances 2013 where this data and ranking information is found.
Kentucky’s “Current Spending” for 2013 was actually $9,316 per pupil while national average spending was just $10,700. That is a spread of only $1,384 per pupil. That difference is over 30 percent lower than Prichard’s numbers show. That’s a pretty big difference.
Oh, the real Census information also shows that Kentucky ranked 35th, not 37th, for its spending in 2013.
Prichard’s numbers don’t agree with the 2002 Census report, either.
But, I guess a 30 percent error is OK when you want to push the state to spend a lot more than it can afford.
You see, Table 12 in the 2013 Public Education Finances edition shows how Kentucky supports education in relationship to taxpayer average income. We ranked 15th in the nation in 2013 for education spending once you allow for the fact that we are not exactly the richest state in the country!
Wow! In 15th place!
You’re not hearing that from Prichard, sadly.