“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
More than 3,000 suggestions were offered in response to Gov. Beshear’s request for ideas on how to make state government work better, more efficiently and at less cost to taxpayers. Taxpayers await the governor’s response.
Click here to listen to the 90-second audio commentary.
One provision in HB 176 is causing a huge amount of turmoil – it’s the standard that says a high school isn’t considered a “Persistently Low-Achieving School” if its graduation rate exceeds a ridiculously low standard of just 60 percent.
Proponents of the bill correctly point out that the number “60” is actually contained in the US Department of Education’s final rules for the Race to the Top fund. But, they are not paying attention to the full description of this provision.
The final Race to the Top (RTTT) rules say in several places such as on pages 59766 and 59767 in the November 18, 2009 Federal Register that a “Persistently Lowest-Achieving School,”
“Is a high school that has had a graduation rate as defined in 34 CFR 200.19(b) that is less than 60 percent over a number of years.”
That reference to 34 CFR 200.19(b) is what HB 176 proponents are conveniently ignoring. The referenced federal regulation defines what is now called the “Cohort Graduation Rate” formula. The 60% figure was intended to be used with that formula.
Now, here’s the rub. Kentucky cannot compute a graduation rate that complies with 34 CFR 200.19(b) until it has a high quality student tracking system in place for four years. As we have abundantly commented before, Kentucky’s Infinite Campus student tracking system is way behind the schedule anticipated by the federal government. We won’t be able to report the first Cohort Graduation Rate data that complies with 34 CFR 200.19(b) until 2014.
Thus, Kentucky cannot currently comply with the RTTT guidance on graduation rates.
What to do?
We do have a US Department of Education exemption from compliance with the Cohort rate for No Child Left Behind purposes until 2014. However, that means we have to use another graduation rate formula for our RTTT threshold. That formula is not harmonized with the 60 percent figure in the RTTT final guidance package.
So, I think those who say the 60 percent figure is a federal requirement that Kentucky can’t increase overlook the fact that we can’t comply with the full definition of that federal requirement in any event.
We need to choose something else in our RTTT package that will give comparable performance with our existing data. Otherwise, we will look like we are trying to game the system.
Considering the stakes, and the fierce competition, and the fact that we are already hobbled in RTTT if we don’t implement charter schools, we don’t need that extra baggage.
Somehow, I can’t believe that our RTTT application would be downgraded if we selected a more rigorous graduation rate threshold (something higher than 60 percent) to better correspond to our current formula’s results. Actually, I would think the US Department of Education judges would be impressed that we took care of this problem, and they might even award more points as a result.
On the other hand, if we keep the 60 percent rate while we use formulas that are less accurate, and more inflated, than the high quality Cohort Rate, we run the risk of losing everything.
Besides, who really wants to go on record saying that a 60 percent high school graduation rate is just fine? I sure don’t.
National leadership of the “other” teachers’ union, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), is stepping up to the plate in a movement towards the sort of professional responsibility we see in other organizations like the American Medical Association.
Education Week announced today (subscription) that Randi Weingarten, president of the AFT has agreed that she is, “putting the sensitive issue of due process on the education reform table, with a pledge to work with districts to streamline the often-cumbersome procedures for dismissing teachers who fail to improve their performance after receiving help and support.”
Now, will our dominant union, the Kentucky Education Association, look at how the growing professionalism at the AFT works and make similar moves, or will the KEA continue to protect teachers tooth and nail under every condition even when it is clearly not in the best interests of children – or even the reputation of the profession itself and its many hard-working, talented and dedicated teachers?
Recently several portals have been added to FreedomKentucky.org in an effort to make it easier for you to find the information you need about issues that affect you everyday! These portals are a gateway to a variety of information about issues such as special needs education, prevailing wage, the 2010 Kentucky general assembly, etc… Below are the links to some of the new portals…
2010 General Assembly – Keep up with the currently legislative session in Kentucky.
Prevailing Wage – find research, reports, and understand the impact in the Commonwealth.
Special Needs Education – a resource for parents.
These portals are just beginning. We need all the information we can gather about these subjects! You can be a part of FreedomKentucky! Learn how here!