Guess which is the worst-run state in America?
If you said California, you would be …. wrong!
THE THIRD GRADE!
Psst: Age 18 dropout laws probably won’t fix this!
“Third grade is a kind of pivot point,” says Donald J. Hernandez, sociology professor at Hunter College, at the City University of New York. “We teach reading for the first three grades and then after that children are not so much learning to read but using their reading skills to learn other topics. In that sense if you haven’t succeeded by 3rd grade it’s more difficult to [remediate] than it would have been if you started before then.”
Quoted from a short article (subscription??) in Education Week’s Inside School Research blog, which should be mandatory reading for everyone involved with education in Kentucky, including our governor.
Hernandez’s study tracks students who were poor readers in the third grade through the rest of their school experience. Some of the study’s findings, shown by the bullets below, are stunning:
• One in six children who are not reading proficiently in third grade fail to graduate from high school on time, four times the rate for children with proficient third-grade reading skills.
• Children who have lived in poverty and are not reading proficiently in third grade are about three times more likely to dropout or fail to graduate from high school than those who have never been poor.
• Among children with two risk factors—poverty and reading skills below the proficient mark— 26 percent do not graduate from high school, compared to 9 percent with these subpar reading scores who have never experienced poverty.
Education Week had additional findings which I didn’t find in the main report. I suspect they come from an interview with Hernandez. Those findings are shown by the following bullets:
• Students who struggled with reading in early elementary school comprise 88 percent of those who did not receive a diploma by age 19.
In other words, you can spot the dropouts way back in third grade. This indicates that just extending the time in school to age 18 has little likelihood of improving graduation rates. The kids still can’t read, so they can’t do the work.
• Low reading skills are an even stronger predictor of dropping out than spending at least a year in poverty.
So much for the poverty excuse!
• 89 percent of students in poverty who did read on level by 3rd grade graduated on time. That’s statistically no different from the students who never experienced poverty but did struggle with reading early on.
Again, so much for the poverty excuse! WHEN poor kids get decent reading instruction, they also succeed.
• More than one in four poor, struggling readers did not graduate, compared with only 2 percent of good readers from wealthier backgrounds.
That’s over 25 percent versus just 2 percent, a ratio of more than 12 times, which shows kids who don’t learn to read by the third grade are phenomenally more likely to drop out of school.
So, let’s get this straight. It’s about reading, and doing it well by the end of third grade, or else very likely bad things are going to happen.
That means a dropout prevention plan that focuses on high school isn’t likely to work very well unless it first teaches challenged high school students to read, and then, somehow, miraculously overcomes years of ineffective education.
Even worse than the fact that this year’s special legislative session was unproductive is how expensive it became.
According to numbers I obtained from the LRC, politicians have cost taxpayers nearly $2 million during the past two years just because they could not get their work done on time.
Last year’s special session to address the budget and the state’s road plan lasted six days and cost $380,000. The price tag for this year’s 24-day session, which lasted from March 14 through April 6: $1.5 million.
These figures are based on the LRC’s estimated cost of $63,500 each day legislators meet in Frankfort.
Since special sessions are called by the governor, who sets the agenda, it’s worthy of note here that Gov. Steve Beshear did not abide by his own past rhetoric about agreement between the House and Senate before calling a special session.
This year’s special session could have been avoided if the governor had agreed to the Kentucky Senate’s bipartisan proposal to cut spending rather than insist that Kentucky borrow $167 million from next year’s Medicaid budget to fill this year’s Medicaid budget deficit. (Read more about Kentucky’s Medicaid program here.)
Perhaps the governor would consider reimbursing taxpayers out of his hefty campaign war chest?
I spoke with Utah’s new U.S. Senator Mike Lee yesterday and asked him what federal spending is beyond the proper scope of federal involvement. His answer is worth hearing.
Now that the special session has ended, the governor and the Health and Family Services secretary have begun their work to move all Medicaid enrollees to managed care in the commonwealth.
Yesterday, CHFS Secretary Janie Miller released a statement announcing that her cabinet had issued a request for proposal (RFP) seeking proposals from managed care organizations (MCOs). The deadline for responses to the RFP is May 25, and the target date to have contracts in place is July 1.
Sec. Miller announced this was a “milestone” for Kentucky’s Medicaid program. Miller stated, “We must aggressively pursue ways to better manage health care services and control rising costs. Managed care is a proven strategy that has been tested in both the public and private sectors.”
But the question remains, if the secretary is so confident about the potential success of managed care, why did the governor veto an independent audit of managed care savings? Will the state be able to save enough to make up for this year’s budgetary mess? Time will surely tell.
The Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions works with Kentuckians, pro-liberty coalitions, grassroots organizations and business owners to advance freedom and prosperity by promoting free-market capitalism, individual liberty and transparent government. Join Us