Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions
banner

Search:


email
   

Send to Friend

To local governments: Butt out of smoking policies

Despite intense lobbying from anti-smoking fanatics, Elsmere's city council kept residents' property rights from going up in smoke by voting against a smoking ban in public places, including privately owned businesses.

Proponents of a ban seized on a limited proposal by Elsmere Mayor Bill Bradford that would have banned smoking only in city buildings. However, Bradford showed courageous leadership by casting the tie-breaking vote against the plan when the ordinance presented to the council went far beyond his original objective.

Opponents said such a ban would overtax Elsmere's police department and harm businesses. Dottie Baxter, owner of JB's Roadhouse in Elsmere says she doesn't tell the city how to do its business and she expects the same courtesy in return.

Baxter is right. Private property even those establishments which employ a large staff or provide services to many people does not belong to the public. Property owners, not government do-gooders, are the rightful decision makers about whether legal activities like smoking should be allowed.

Proponents of bans often aim at restaurant owners by comparing rules against smoking to regulations protecting diners from impure foods. However, the comparisons are not analogous. Restaurant patrons have no advance warning of contaminated foods, but are aware up-front of the presence of second-hand smoke by simply using their noses.

The law should provide appropriate legal reprimand for restaurant owners who engage in acts that injure patrons or workers. But customers are acutely aware of the hazards of second-hand smoke and can easily avoid the risk by leaving. No one is holding a gun to non-smokers heads and forcing them to go to bars or restaurants that allow smoking.

Consumers increasingly choose to avoid second-hand smoke. As a result, more restaurants are making their establishments smoke-free. But they should be allowed to voluntarily make that decision. Governments should butt out.

Sources:

Elsmere rejects smoking ban by Kevin Eigelbach, The Kentucky Post

Bloomberg Smokes out Property Rights by Robert A. Levy, Cato Institute

 


Comments

Add new comment:
Name *
Website  
Remember Me  
Comment *
number
In order to prevent "spam entries", we require that you enter the numerical code in the grey box, as you submit your posting. Thank you for your cooperation.
You may edit it as long as you don't exit your browser. After moderator approval, it will be visible for public.