NKAPC stonewalls institute’s open-records request to find out more about bloated agency’s finances

The bloated Northern Kentucky Area Planning Commission doesn’t seem overjoyed with the Bluegrass Institute’s request last week to find out more about how it records its finances.

An open-records request was filed by Logan Morford, the institute’s vice president of transparency.

Lori Remley, NKAPC’s administrative assistant, responded with the generally helpful spirit of your typical government bureaucrat:

“Please be advised that the records you have requested cannot be provided electronically. However, pursuant to KRS 61, we would be happy to provide copies of these records at a cost of $0.10/page. If you wish to proceed with your request, I will provide the approximate copying cost. Once I have received your check, I will have the documents copied and will contact you regarding any balance due. This amount, along with any postage, will need to be paid prior to the documents being mailed to you. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.”

Very nice of you, Ms. Remley, to offer to answer “any questions.” So here are a couple:

1. If, in fact, you do not have the records in electronic form — which there is plenty of reason to doubt, since we are now well into the 21st century — then doesn’t this offer yet another indication of why this commission needs to be downsized and made efficient? (Read my Bluegrass Beacon columns about citizens’ attempts to get the future of the NKAPC placed on November’s ballot and how they ran into a local good-ol-boys (and girls, including Kenton County Clerk Gabrielle Summe, who ruled thousands of signatures gathered on a petition to place the commission’s future before the voters) here and here.)

2. Since when should taxpayers be required to “provide a check” ahead of time before you can even begin to process a request? This is especially insulting considering taxpayers in your region already are paying three times as much in planning taxes as residents of Boone and Campbell counties. Wouldn’t you agree?

3. Why was it necessary to copy attorney Gary “Can anyone say ‘conflict of interest?’” Edmondson on the email answering our open records request. Oh, that’s right! Mr. Edmondson has represented NKAPC in his private practice even while he files suit as the county attorney to hinder civic-minded taxpayers who simply want to decide the future of their own government. But if you would allow me a follow-up, Ms. Remley: Do you think that it is ethical for Mr. Edmondson, the country attorney, to also be involved in preventing citizens who want the right to vote on NKAPC’s future to also have the agency as a client of his private law practice?

Perhaps if we send you the postage ahead of time, you could mail us an answer to that question, as well.

Live Twitter updates during gubernatorial debate

KET’s Kentucky Tonight will be hosting the Kentucky gubernatorial debate this evening. Be sure to tune in. Kentucky voters deserve to witness a conversation between the three people who wish to lead the state.

BIPPS will be providing live coverage via Twitter. Follow us @BIPPS. The hashtag for the event is #KYelect.

 

Louisiana’s miracle in post-Katrina schools continues

If charter schools not part of answer, then what is?

Kentucky needs to find out

The Louisiana Department of Education recently released its public school only analysis of ACT college entrance test scores for the graduating class of 2011.

There is some remarkable data in this release for the ‘Recovery School District’ schools in the state. These are the schools that were rebuilt from the flood-torn debris of Hurricane Katrina. Most, if not all, are reportedly charter schools.

Here is how the ACT Composite Score has trended since the RSD started to get separate reports in 2007.

Source Note: Data in table from annual reports available here.

Very simply, this is remarkable improvement. In fact, such a rise in scores could make me suspicious that cheating was in play except that the ACT, Incorporated is looking out for that sort of thing. Just ask the people who cheated in Perry County, Kentucky.

So, here is more evidence that the charter-school-heavy school recovery in Louisiana is making some really interesting progress on a test that means something.

It could be scary: Beshear is going to show up to a ‘debate’ … tonight!

It’s a rarity. Steve Beshear, the incumbent governor of Kentucky, is actually going to show up for a campaign debate tonight.

This could be scary. The gubernatorial debate is at 8 p.m. eastern tonight.

Shhhh…but we better not say “debate” too loud because Beshear, for the most part, has refused to participate in any event called a “debate.” If he hears this, he might get spooked and change his mind.

His two opponents, Senate President David Williams, a Republican, and Independent candidate Gatewood Galbraith have both been working hard in this campaign, always willing to show up and take the heat.

But not Beshear.

Of course, I’m not surprised the incumbent governor didn’t show up at last month’s KET debate on education. When you’re governor of a state with tanking graduation rates, high remediation rates and a widening achievement gap between black and white students in your largest school district, it’s really tough to come up with spin that’s even halfway believable.

The only K-12 education policy Beshear has had is to try and force kids to keep showing up at school until they’re 18. How ironic — coming from an elected official who doesn’t show up to defend his policies (whatever those may be exactly).

With high unemployment rates, a tanking economy, high tax rates, a lack of public school choice and the stranglehold that labor unions have on this commonwealth, taxpayers and voters should be outraged at Beshear’ hide-and-seek strategy.

Education Department wants out of No Child accountability

Could significantly undermine school focus on minority student performance

A new news release says the Kentucky Department of Education is asking for a waiver from some key requirements in the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

Despite some appropriate criticisms, this federal act, often simply referred to by its initials as NCLB, created the first real pressure on Kentucky’s public school system to perform better with minority students, students from poverty and students with learning disabilities.

Under NCLB, schools had to separately show adequate progress each year for each student subgroup in the school. This emphasis on student subgroups was never required by either the original KERA period assessment, known as KIRIS, or the more recent CATS assessment, also now defunct.

Kentucky is launching a new school assessment and accountability program this year to replace CATS. The new program should be notably better than either of its predecessors. In fact, the new assessment does have an element that looks at performance gaps for minorities and other student groups, though only in math and reading. The education department wants to substitute this new assessment program for NCLB requirements.

The problem is that the emphasis on student subgroup performance is GREATLY reduced with Kentucky’s new state assessment program from the sort of emphasis NCLB requires.

Instead of monitoring separate, must-pass set goals for each student subgroup, the new Kentucky gap program results could become lost, averaged in with results from a number of other assessment areas. Under Kentucky’s program, all of the results from various academic tests, writing and arts program reviews, staff development and the gaps analysis will be added together to develop a final, single performance score for each school.

Only, that one, final number will be compared to the required target goals. Thus, a school could perform poorly for some student subgroups but still get an acceptable overall score due to unbalanced better performance in other areas. The end result would be: leaving kids behind.

To its credit, the Kentucky Department of Education has uploaded a ton of information about the new – and complex – state accountability system and its waiver request here (scroll to the bottom of the page to access the actual waiver request documents).

The public has until November 8, 2011 to e-mail comments about the waiver request here.

Because of the potential impact on the focus on closing achievement gaps, our readers might want to take the time to look over the material and let their opinions be known.

Today’s version of ‘Kentucky Behind and Looking Forward to Staying that Way’: Refusing to hold teachers accountable

Look on the list of nearly half of states that now use student test scores to evaluate teachers, and you will not find Kentucky.

But you will find:

* Four of Kentucky’s seven neighboring states among the 17 states and Washington, D.C. that use test scores as a meaningful factor in evaluating teachers.

* Dennis Van Roekel, chief boss of the USA’s largest teachers’ union, talking about why it can’t be done. Van Roekel argues that “value-added measures are too unreliable to serve as the chief factor in evaluating teachers,” according to Yahoo News.

But don’t bother telling Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Tennessee that. They’re already doing it.

Man in the mirror: Change your ways

Now would be a good time for those charged with educating and leading our nation’s young people to take a good, long look in the mirror and reevaluate their priorities and practices.

It’s not enough for leaders in our educational system – whether iconic coaches of powerhouse football programs or local superintendents and the school boards who employ them – to barely do what’s legally required. They have a moral mandate, too.

Legally, legendary Penn State University football coach Joe Paterno was only required to report incidents of abuse to his immediate superiors. But if those superiors’ response did not reflect the seriousness of the situation, all debate is removed about whether he – or anyone else involved for that matter – had a moral obligation not to allow a cover-up to occur.

A cover-up of different sorts is going on in Kentucky.

Students in some of the commonwealth’s persistently failing school districts have no one holding those in power sufficiently accountable for the educational maltreatment occurring in their classrooms.

Instead, these failing districts usually have enablers who seem more than willing to suppress the truth about their performance in the name of protecting a district or a popular leader from proper scrutiny – much less any real consequences.

For instance, the Dayton Independent School district inNorthern Kentucky is one of Kentucky’s smallest – only 32 of the commonwealth’s 174 districts are smaller – yet Gary Rye, its superintendent, takes home the 19th-highest salary among all of the state’s superintendents.

Yet despite the fact that the only high school in Rye’s district is among the state-designated “Persistently Low-Achieving Schools” – schools that have spiraled downwardin a state of continuing academic failure for years – he will take home a taxpayer-funded salary of $141,441.27 this year.

What we don’t know is whether the Dayton school board has held Rye accountable in any fashion for his district’s failure. Apparently, no written evaluation of Rye exists.

In a letter to the Bluegrass Institute, the board’s attorney Matthew DeMarcus wrote: “The Dayton Independent Board of Education conducts an oral evaluation. Therefore, there is no hard copy or electronic copy of the evaluation.”

While state law allows school boards to establish their own policies for evaluating superintendents, it mandates that once procedures are established, they must be followed.

That’s what so puzzling about the Dayton board’s action. Not only does its policy state that the board “shall develop procedures and forms for the evaluation of the Superintendent,” but also that the superintendent’s annual “summative evaluation shall be made available to the public on request.”

This requirement was not forced upon this board by the state. They made it their policy, but apparently refuse to follow it when doing so may present an inconvenience for the image of the district or its leaders.

Where are the “forms?” How about those “summative evaluations … available to the public on request?”

We’re not talking here about people in charge of the quality of widgets being turned out in some factory. This is about the future prospects of hundreds of young Kentuckians inevery district where such educational hanky-panky is rampant.

So, even if school board members are not legally requiredto report on the failure of those entrusted to lead, they aremorally bound to do so.

The Good Book warns: “to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.”

“We don’t have them because we just do ‘oral evaluations’ of the superintendent” speaks of the leaders of a failing school district that needs to take a collective look in themirror.

Let’s hope they – and every official in all failing Kentucky school districts – don’t like what they see.

— Jim Waters is vice president of communications for the Bluegrass Institute, Kentucky’s free-market think tank. Reach him at jwaters@freedomkentucky.com. Read previously published columns at www.freedomkentucky.org/bluegrassbeacon.

BIPPS president discusses pension crisis on WLEX

This week, WLEX in Lexington, KY aired a special investigative report looking at legislator pension benefits. BIPPS President Phil Moffett was interviewed for the report which you can view below…

…yet another way the top of ticket affects down-ticket candidates

Now, it’s not only Gov. Beshear not showing up for debates, now  Bob Farmer, his agriculture candidate just didn’t bother to attend a long-planned debate at Western Kentucky University on Wednesday.

Give Republican James Comer credit for showing up. But wouldn’t it be great for him to do what a candidate for another unnecessary office, Ken Moellman, is doing ? Moellman’s campaign platform involves calling for getting rid of the office of Kentucky State Treasurer.

Seriously, why does Kentucky need an agriculture commissioner?

Should taxpayers be funding these offices – just because someone wants a stepping stone to higher office?

If Ohio caves in to its unions, it sure will be nice for Kentucky

It was a nasty shock.

Thanks to a number of incentives, including what is currently a much more favorable business climate, Omnicare – a Fortune 400 company – recently announced it was pulling up stakes in Northern Kentucky and moving across the river to Ohio.

That sort of thing happens when states like Kentucky allow excessive influence from government employees in the state’s legislative affairs. Inevitably, policies that shun business lead to business shunning the state. The state’s economy suffers accordingly.

However, Ohio may be poised to do Kentucky a huge favor. There is a ballot item up there that will level the competition-for-business playing field again, though in the wrong direction.

This ballot item will repeal Senate Bill 5, an important law reducing the excessive influence of public employee unions in Ohio’s state affairs. Repealing this law would once again subject the Buckeye state to the powerful, parochial and business- and economy-adverse activities of its public employee unions.

Well, I live in Kentucky. We are still smarting from losing a really major business to Ohio’s currently better business climate.

So, bring it on, Ohio voters! Kentucky will probably benefit from your blunder if you re-hobble yourselves to business-adverse policies again.

Before you Ohioans are done, maybe we could even get Omnicare back!